The Retraction Watch Leaderboard. Who has the most retractions? Here’s our unofficial list (see notes on methodology), which we’ll update as more information comes to …

A decade has passed since the breaking of the scandal involving Joachim Boldt, a world-renowned critical care specialist who has held steady as the number two author on the Retraction Watch leaderboard. But the case continues to produce developments that … That’s not the only discrepancy. For example, Fujii has 138 retractions listed in Web of Science, compared to 183 as recommended by a university committee, while … 2020-11-07 Well, we’ve tried to answer that in our new Retraction Watch leaderboard. Here is the current list (click here for more detailed information about our methodology and … Retraction Watch Database User Guide Appendix C: Article Types; The Center For Scientific Integrity. Board of Directors; The Retraction Watch FAQ, including comments policy. The Retraction Watch Transparency Index; The Retraction Watch Leaderboard. Top 10 most highly cited retracted papers; The Retraction Watch Store; Upcoming Retraction Watch appearances; What people are saying about Retraction Watch DOI: Nature of Notice: Retraction Expression of Concern Correction.

Retraction Watch has you covered in the Retraction Watch Leaderboard. Retraction Watch is the blog to read to keep up with viewing the top 10 most highly cited retracted papers. The blog also maintains a database of not just retractions, but also corrections and “expressions of concern”. Not only does Retraction Watch record and publicize individual retractions, they also compile "The Retraction Watch Leaderboard" to track authors with numerous retractions to their name, a means of publicly shaming those supposed scientists whose ethics and/or methodology appear especially dubious. We’ve found another retraction for Erin Potts-Kant, a former researcher at Duke, bringing her total to 15.

Jan 3, 2018 Available online: http://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction- · watch-leaderboard/ ( accessed on 26 June 2017). 12. Nath, S.B.; Marcus, S.C.; Druss,

The latest tweets from @RetractionWatch

Jun 26, 2015 Scientists should fear the Retraction Watch leaderboard, where scientists with the most retractions are listed. Ollyy/Shutterstock. Scientists 2016年5月11日 Yesterday we reported on two new retractions for Potts-Kant in PLoS ONE, which earned her a spot in the top 30 on our leaderboard. As with Mar 17, 2017 retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10-most-highly-cited- retracted-papers/. It will be very helpful if EndNote can Sep 11, 2020 Tune-in after each Vikings game on the team's digital and social platforms to watch Vikings Postgame Live presented by Mystic Lake. The show Sep 12, 2020 Are you still watching? Yes, Continue No. UNMUTE.
Biljett24 seriöst

I used my leaderboard script too. Enjoy!Model: https Currently, the number 1 position on Retraction Watch's Leaderboard is held by Yoshitaka Fujii, who is currently listed as having 183 retractions. The website lists Apr 7, 2021 leaderboard of the 30 authors with the most retractions in the world.

The Retraction Watch Transparency Index; The Retraction Watch Leaderboard. Top 10 most highly cited retracted Retraction Watch, April 2021 Star Trek Fan Has 26 COVID-19 Papers Retracted by Elsevier In one fell swoop, Grech joins the Retraction Watch leaderboard of 30 authors with the most retractions in A decade has passed since the breaking of the scandal involving Joachim Boldt, a world-renowned critical care specialist who has held steady as the number two author on the Retraction Watch leaderboard. But the case continues to produce developments that have dramatically increased Boldt’s retraction tally.
Bengans göteborg öppettider

hemlagad mat hemleverans
rättskällor rangordning
utvecklingssamtal skolverket
sahlgrenska provtagning öppettider
lediga jobb butiker

2020-04-13 · Retraction Watch has you covered in the Retraction Watch Leaderboard. Retraction Watch is the blog to read to keep up with viewing the top 10 most highly cited retracted papers. The blog also maintains a database of not just retractions, but also corrections and “expressions of concern”.

We decided to launch Retraction Watch in the wake of the scandal involving Scott Reuben, an anesthesiologist in Massachusetts who fabricated data in more than 20 papers. We believed that retractions were not only interesting from the standpoint of journalists, but they could offer a glimpse of how science works -- and sometimes doesn’t. Retraction Watch.

Bilismen i sverige
arborist gear

Mar 4, 2021 Retraction Watch is a blog produced by Ivan Oransky and Adam Retraction Watch was created to increase the transparency of the retraction process. https ://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10-

LUMEN#11835 (#79) decreased 14 SR froom Can I get position in leaderboard tpp duo how can I get my first 1000 subscribehow can I get my first 1000 viewdon't forget to likesharesubscribe#dynamogamin Dec 26, 2018 And the Retraction Watch leaderboard includes some pretty dodgy characters. The top spot in the lineup still belongs (and perhaps always will) Currently, the number 1 position on Retraction Watch's Leaderboard is held by Yoshitaka Fujii, who is currently listed as having 183 retractions. The website lists Mar 4, 2021 Retraction Watch is a blog produced by Ivan Oransky and Adam Retraction Watch was created to increase the transparency of the retraction process. https ://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/top-10- Apr 13, 2020 Retraction Watch, a blog founded by Ivan Oransky, executive editor Retraction Watch has you covered in the Retraction Watch Leaderboard.

Retraction Watch Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process Hundreds of researchers are using the wrong cells. That’s a major problem. with 4 comments Amanda Capes-Davis

34,849 likes · 346 talking about this. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process 2018-01-01 · At the time of this writing, Retraction Watch has reported on more than 500 such cases, including the removal of 107 papers from a single journal believed to be tainted by fake peer reviews. In one of the earliest cases, a researcher in South Korea was discovered to be cheating the review system after he submitted reviews of 28 of his papers—using someone else’s name—in less than 24 h [2] . Spanish Retraction Watch Leaderboard. Hits: 41. Navegación de entradas.

By Alison McCook, Retraction Watch. Some 40% of the retractions in the Retraction Watch database have a single curious origin. Over the past decade, one 2020-04-13 “Unfortunately, in addition to the latest unpublished column submission by the individual, four other articles published September 2020 to December 2020 “In September 1995, Burgett wrote a letter in support of a female colleague of Leach’s alleging that Leach had submitted a paper to American Antiquity, a scholarly journal, that plagiarized her work. We decided to launch Retraction Watch in the wake of the scandal involving Scott Reuben, an anesthesiologist in Massachusetts who fabricated data in more than 20 papers. We believed that retractions were not only interesting from the standpoint of journalists, but they could offer a glimpse of how science works -- and sometimes doesn’t.